<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Seth Goldstein Online - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-e0a4794f" type="application/json"/><link>http://codehound.disqus.com/</link><description>My ideas on the world of Web Design/Development and more!</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:44:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Bookmarks for June 26th through June 28th</title><link>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/bookmarks-for-june-26th-through-june-28th/#comment-12014955</link><description>Thank you for this article. now google helps us or discipline us on how to practice ethical optimization!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ginocarpio</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:44:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Links are the key to getting higher up in the rankings in the search engines</title><link>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/links-are-the-key-to-getting-higher-up-in-the-rankings-in-the-search-engines/#comment-11492836</link><description>Hey Seth,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great video. We are struggling with getting the "good" Google links. We have around 1,400 listed by our IBP program software for Yahoo links, but only 7 for Google. Does this mean that Google does not recognize the quality of our other links? Thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Susan White</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 00:02:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which is Better CSS-based Layouts or Table-Based Layouts? Google&amp;#8217;s Matt Cutts says doesn&amp;#8217;t matter&amp;#8230; but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/which-is-better-css-based-layouts-or-table-based-layouts-googles-matt-cutts-says-doesnt-matter/#comment-10978231</link><description>I agree. CSS is the way to make Websites to standard and a way to ensure usability. Until email is able to fully use CSS, keep tables to email newsletters is about the amount of Tables someone should be using.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">goldsteinmedia</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:56:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Which is Better CSS-based Layouts or Table-Based Layouts? Google&amp;#8217;s Matt Cutts says doesn&amp;#8217;t matter&amp;#8230; but&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/which-is-better-css-based-layouts-or-table-based-layouts-googles-matt-cutts-says-doesnt-matter/#comment-10959921</link><description>Casting aside the simply fact that search engines shouldn't have to revisit their algorithms to accommodate archaic and deprecated markup, there are so many reasons not to use tables, I can't bring myself to do so - not for a website.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tables might make some sense on the level of linear, single-channel thinking but that's pretty much the only benefit. Even then, the people who'd most obviously choose to tables are doing so through a WYSIWYG.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The deprecated use of the the table family of tags is flawed on every level besides simply SEO. Flexibility, extensibility &amp; accessibility all suffer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Despite table-based design having the small benefit of having a reasonably intuitive build-structure, they're a huge pain to add/edit/modify. Extensibility? Deciding on table-based design is actively choosing to go down an archaic path. Table-based design promotes a dirty mix of content &amp; deprecated html tags used to modify visual/look feel. That means your markup is all mucked up with unnecessary garbage and pulling down the pure content later on for some sort of redesign will be ever-more difficult.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe in the pure separation of markup (HTML) and CSS. Design and information should be live apart.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now on the level of accessibility, text readers and devices aside from your standard web browser pretty much throw fits when you're using tables, simply put. This is something web designers really need to be more considerate of. We're designing not just for screen resolutions, but we should also consider mobile devices, text readers and also create print style sheets.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All things considered, do we always have time to build our sites in a scalable manner so that one day we know we can scrap the CSS and not worry about it? Do we know if our markup can standalone and survive a back-end re-platform? Do we really have the time and budget to consider mobile devices, text readers and printing? Seldom, if ever. However, I'd rather do it safe and do it right the first time around.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Leave tables to email newsletters.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michaelangelo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:03:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PPC vs. Organic SEO</title><link>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/ppc-vs-organic-seo/#comment-10881183</link><description>I don't think either is better. I think that if you're at the top for both it adds a lot of credibility. In the long run you're going to pay for it either way. To get a top 3 ranking with an seo company you're going to spend at least $1000 depending on the competition. You'll get more traffic with organic, but you'll have more control with ppc.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pay_per_click</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 04:37:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: links for 2009-05-20</title><link>http://www.goldsteinmedia.com/blog/links-for-2009-05-20/#comment-10144304</link><description>really like the idea of comment luv since it is a way to return the web back to being a collaboratives place. I think when you first put up your site you are excited and feel like your content will take over the world then you quickly realize that the only way to keep up there in search rankings is by building relationships with other webmasters.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Management College In Indore</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 06:18:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WAYS TO INCREASE WEBSITE TRAFFIC</title><link>http://www.sethgoldstein.net/ways-to-increase-website-traffic/#comment-8417992</link><description>thanks for the helpful advice</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sarah mcginty</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:06:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter a Black-hole and Dangerous?</title><link>http://www.sethgoldstein.net/is-twitter-a-black-hole-and-dangerous/#comment-7491819</link><description>There's always &lt;a href="http://tarpipe.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tarpipe.com&lt;/a&gt; slowly coming to the rescue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe it will eventually be the way to manage your communications across multiple platforms, but they need to get in gear.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ErisDS</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:39:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bookmarks for March 4th through March 5th</title><link>http://www.sethgoldstein.net/bookmarks-for-march-4th-through-march-5th/#comment-7263596</link><description>This is the REAL Adam Arzoomanian. HOW dare you call me a CYBER CRIMINAL I am a victim of identity theft and Dont even own a computer!! Sanford Wallace is a covicted criminal . I have never been charged nor convicted of any crime!!! He Stole my identity and has destroyed my reputation. I need help fighting this because I have neither the ability not the resoures to do ANY of what i have been alleged to have done.What makes more sense? Someone with no formal computer training or criminal history with a unblemished history in property, resort and nightclub management was a MASTERMIND of and elaberate world  wide computer scam. Or the SPAM king stole his identity and did it without his consent or knowledge? MMM use your head people I have been destroyed by this man. I cant even take care of my stage three cancer ridden wife becasue I cant get a job. If by some chance some kind good person out there can help me to clear my name I would be greatfull.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Arzoomanian</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:51:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: links for 2009-02-17</title><link>http://www.sethgoldstein.net/2009/02/17/links-for-2009-02-17/#comment-6905390</link><description>I just wanted to thank you for linking to the post I wrote about reciprocal link exchanges.  When I wrote it I wasn't quite sure how well it would go over since so many people probably disagree, but so far it's looking pretty good!  Thanks again!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eli the Link Builder</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 10:54:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: TechCrunch: Japanese Girl Sensation: Virtual Boyfriends (Webkare)</title><link>http://www.sethgoldstein.net/2008/09/21/techcrunch-japanese-girl-sensation-virtual-boyfriends-webkare/#comment-6704185</link><description>i think those girls would be better off trying some online dating sites! At least they'd be meeting real men and might even end their loneliness in the real world.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">online dating</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:22:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: links for 2009-02-17</title><link>http://www.sethgoldstein.net/2009/02/17/links-for-2009-02-17/#comment-6490641</link><description>sounds like Facebook made the same mistake that Google made with their Chrome (web browser) end user license agreement</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">coffee</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:37:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No one ever said SEO and SERP ranking was easy | Seth Goldstein Online</title><link>http://www.sethgoldstein.net/2008/11/18/no-one-ever-said-seo-and-serp-ranking-was-easy/#comment-6458384</link><description>for video submission tool, I uses traffic geyser, it mass submits videos to over 60 websites in minutes, its pretty helpful to gain SERP and also linkbacks.. and other methods such as social bookmarking is one of my favorites.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Traffic Geyser</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 03:41:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook users own their content, Facebook&amp;#8217;s Zuckerberg writes after chaos</title><link>http://www.sethgoldstein.net/2009/02/16/facebook-users-own-their-content-facebooks-zuckerberg-writes-after-chaos/#comment-6372092</link><description>That’s fairly common language in terms for various sites such as Facebook. While it gives Facebook some far-reaching and scary possibilities, the basic idea is that things you upload may end up residing on servers outside of Facebook’s direct control. These broad rights make it so that you can’t sue Facebook for some cached content on some other server, but yes, it also means they can sell your photos or use them in advertising with no recompense to you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">monicaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 07:45:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sex, Lies and Texting: Decoding Your Girl - Guides - Cell Phones.Org | Seth Goldstein Online</title><link>http://www.sethgoldstein.net/2008/10/14/sex-lies-and-texting-decoding-your-girl-guides-cell-phonesorg/#comment-6367520</link><description>hey man my girl and i have been dating for 9 months and she has teased the idea to me a couple of times but i got a txt from her saying... "now i have "lets talk about sex baby" stuck in my head" what does it mean?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Grant</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:50:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paid Links: A Black Hat/White Hat Discussion</title><link>http://www.sethgoldstein.net/2008/12/12/paid-links-a-black-hatwhite-hat-discussion/#comment-6314570</link><description>this is an awsome blog</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">diane0719ac</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:10:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No one ever said SEO and SERP ranking was easy | Seth Goldstein Online</title><link>http://www.sethgoldstein.net/2008/11/18/no-one-ever-said-seo-and-serp-ranking-was-easy/#comment-6275980</link><description>I might be way off here, but in Google Webmaster Tools you can check your most popular rankings.&lt;br&gt;Besides from that I use about 10 WP plugins and Google Analytics.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Software</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 11:31:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Micro-Site Mistake - SEOMoz</title><link>http://www.sethgoldstein.net/2009/01/30/the-micro-site-mistake-seomoz/#comment-5720062</link><description>So which is better, a single link from a highly ranked site or several links from a bunch of smaller sites?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DominateIM</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:30:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Paid Links: A Black Hat/White Hat Discussion</title><link>http://www.sethgoldstein.net/2008/12/12/paid-links-a-black-hatwhite-hat-discussion/#comment-5719960</link><description>If the links are contextually relevent to your site, I don't see why you shouldn't be able to buy links.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DominateIM</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:22:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mastering the Privacy Settings on Facebook</title><link>http://www.sethgoldstein.net/2009/01/27/mastering-the-privacy-settings-on-facebook/#comment-5653178</link><description>Valuable information.   Most of this you don't understand when you first sign up.   Facebook is more complex than it first appears.  Good to know we have these options.  I'm going to use these suggestions.  Thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brenda Heisler</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:27:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Perry Belcher on How to Make Money from Social Networks</title><link>http://www.sethgoldstein.net/2008/12/12/perry-belcher-on-how-to-make-money-from-social-networks/#comment-5425865</link><description>Too many compliments on your article...&lt;br&gt;Well just can say best of luck &lt;br&gt;Thanks</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">patricklara09</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:49:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No one ever said SEO and SERP ranking was easy | Seth Goldstein Online</title><link>http://www.sethgoldstein.net/2008/11/18/no-one-ever-said-seo-and-serp-ranking-was-easy/#comment-5391069</link><description>for me, i better use manual SEO, that means, making a useful content, than find backlinks from related sites as much as we can. cmiiw.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rahach</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 06:48:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook vs Twitter</title><link>http://www.sethgoldstein.net/2009/01/12/facebook-vs-twitter/#comment-5378015</link><description>You have very informational pros and cons here. Personally, I find twitter to be more helpful with promotion and I use Facebook for friends and family. Mind you, sometimes the two do intermingle. I have made some friends on twitter and I have friended some people I work with. That being said, I find it much easier to deal with the many social media platforms by categorizing them this way in my head.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott Mahler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:28:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guest Post: There&amp;#8217;s never been a better time for free publicity</title><link>http://www.sethgoldstein.net/2009/01/12/guest-post-theres-never-been-a-better-time-for-free-publicity/#comment-5084041</link><description>Great post from Tanya! Make sure you friend her @tcbmarketing on Twitter</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">goldsteinmedia</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:23:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Guest Post: There&amp;#8217;s never been a better time for free publicity</title><link>http://www.sethgoldstein.net/2009/01/12/guest-post-theres-never-been-a-better-time-for-free-publicity/#comment-5083921</link><description>Great advice! And you're right, with the explosion of social media, it's never been easier (or cheaper) to get exposure for your business. Anybody that isn't taking full advantage of these opportunities, I believe, will lose business to the ones who do. I also like the tip about not giving up. That's my motto; a rejection is just one step closer to a yes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jennifer Larson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:15:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>